Wednesday, May 24, 2006

walking on water


"You're not crazy, the culture is crazy. If it seems insane to you that our culture is systematically dismantling the ecological infrastructure of the planet, yet we pay less attention to that than we do to professional sports (Go Mariners!), that's because it is insane. If it seems senseless to you that our culture values money and economic productivity over human and nonhuman lives, that's because it is senseless. If it seems crazy to you that most people spend most of their waking hours working jobs they'd rather not do, that's because it is crazy. There's nothing wrong with you for thinking these things. In fact it means you're still alive.

I wish also that someone would have told me- one hundred times if that was what it took for me to hear it- that it's okay to be happy, it's okay to live your life exactly the way you want it. It's okay to not get a job. It's okay to never get a job. It's okay to find waht makes you happy and then to fight for it. To dedicate your life to discovering who you are."

-Derrick Jensen, from his book "walking on water"

(photo courtesy of www.earthfuture.org

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

my favourite wombat




















(photo courtesy of: http://www.jabberwocks.com/memberfiles/jouimette1.jpg)

check it out:
http://globalcommunity.org/flash/wombat.shtml

questioning development













courtesy of: http://www.worldbank.org.cn/Chinese/youth/issues/corruption/images/yt-issue-corruption.jpeg

Monday, May 15, 2006

"...poverty is not about failed development, poor technology, lack of resources, mismanagement, or poor planning, but rather that it represents a routine, everyday, normal manifestation of the very process of economic development; indeed, development has caused modern poverty...

the "problem" should no longer be confined to the place where we see the tangible, physical evidence of poverty, but that it should include the very intellect that helped us conceptualize poverty in the first place. This leaves us in a serious predicament, because the academic tools at our command -- that is, the paradigms of development and the epistemology of poverty -- pose an obstacle to the solution by distorting our understanding of the problem.

...The Marxist theoretician Gramsci's concept of hegemony provides a useful tool to examine the role of intellectuals in constructing the social consensus. Drawing on the work of Gramsci, Williams (1983, 145), in his book Keywords, described the concept of hegemony in the following way:
It is not limited to matters of direct political control but seeks to describe a more general predominance which includes, as one of its key features, a particular way of seeing the world and human nature and relationships. ... it is seen to depend for its hold not only on this expression in the interests of the ruling class but also on its acceptance as "normal reality" or "commonsense" by those in practice subordinate to it...

In the Third World today, economic development has become a hegemonic idea for building national consensus. It is promoted not only as a political goal of the nation-state, but also as an expression of scientific rationality and technological progress..."

Source

Yapa, Lakshman. "What are improved seeds? An epistemology of the green revolution. (Theme Issue: Environment and Development, part 1)." Economic Geography 69.n3 (July 1993): 254(20).

economic hitmen













courtesy of: http://thailandesl.chazzsongs.net/stories/hitman.jpg

Here's an excerpt from a Democracy Now! interview with John Perkins, a former member of the international banking community. He talks about his experience as a highly paid professional whereby he assisted the U.S. in cheating poor countries out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could repay.

AMY GOODMAN: .. explain this term, “economic hit man,” e.h.m., as you call it.

JOHN PERKINS: Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring -- to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we’ve been very successful. We’ve built the largest empire in the history of the world. It's been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It's only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.

AMY GOODMAN: How did you become one? Who did you work for?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, I was initially recruited while I was in business school back in the late sixties by the National Security Agency, the nation's largest and least understood spy organization; but ultimately I worked for private corporations. The first real economic hit man was back in the early 1950's, Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Teddy, who overthrew of government of Iran, a democratically elected government, Mossadegh’s government who was Time's magazine person of the year; and he was so successful at doing this without any bloodshed -- well, there was a little bloodshed, but no military intervention, just spending millions of dollars and replaced Mossadegh with the Shah of Iran. At that point, we understood that this idea of economic hit man was an extremely good one. We didn't have to worry about the threat of war with Russia when we did it this way. The problem with that was that Roosevelt was a C.I.A. agent. He was a government employee. Had he been caught, we would have been in a lot of trouble. It would have been very embarrassing. So, at that point, the decision was made to use organizations like the C.I.A. and the N.S.A. to recruit potential economic hit men like me and then send us to work for private consulting companies, engineering firms, construction companies, so that if we were caught, there would be no connection with the government.

AMY GOODMAN: Okay. Explain the company you worked for.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, the company I worked for was a company named Chas. T. Main in Boston, Massachusetts. We were about 2,000 employees, and I became its chief economist. I ended up having fifty people working for me. But my real job was deal-making. It was giving loans to other countries, huge loans, much bigger than they could possibly repay. One of the conditions of the loan–let's say a $1 billion to a country like Indonesia or Ecuador–and this country would then have to give ninety percent of that loan back to a U.S. company, or U.S. companies, to build the infrastructure–a Halliburton or a Bechtel. These were big ones. Those companies would then go in and build an electrical system or ports or highways, and these would basically serve just a few of the very wealthiest families in those countries. The poor people in those countries would be stuck ultimately with this amazing debt that they couldn’t possibly repay. A country today like Ecuador owes over fifty percent of its national budget just to pay down its debt. And it really can’t do it. So, we literally have them over a barrel. So, when we want more oil, we go to Ecuador and say, “Look, you're not able to repay your debts, therefore give our oil companies your Amazon rain forest, which are filled with oil.” And today we're going in and destroying Amazonian rain forests, forcing Ecuador to give them to us because they’ve accumulated all this debt. So we make this big loan, most of it comes back to the United States, the country is left with the debt plus lots of interest, and they basically become our servants, our slaves. It's an empire. There's no two ways about it. It’s a huge empire. It's been extremely successful.

For the full interview, check out: http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/09/1526251